When we launch a new product, we all hope it's
going to be a runaway bestseller. More than that, most of us aim to
produce a product so remarkable that it generates rave reviews and
achieves cult popularity. You may very well achieve all of these
objectives with your product launches.
But, beware of a characteristic of the ClickBank
system that may throw these aspirations into jeopardy - the 90-day
refund rule.
Most merchants agree that ClickBank's rock-solid
refund policy adds a great deal of credibility to their sales pitches,
enabling them to make sales to even the most wary of online shoppers.
The hassle-free refund procedure is also the key factor behind
ClickBank's exceptionally low chargeback rate. ClickBank customers have
no need to ask their banks for chargebacks, so ClickBank keeps its
merchant account in good standing and we merchants all save money on
chargeback penalties.
But, despite its attractions, the ClickBank refund
rule is also a source of blatant abuse by a minority of dishonest
buyers.
However good a product may be; however much your
genuine buyers love it, there will always be a small percentage who ask
for refunds. Don't be disheartened. In most cases, this is not a
reflection on your product or your competence as a merchant. It is
simply an exploitation of the ClickBank refund system to get something
for nothing.
Around 5% of my ClickBank sales result in refunds
and, judging by my discussions with other merchants, this figure
appears to be about average. I have numerous glowing testimonials from
satisfied customers, but there is still the occasional buyer who is,
seemingly, impossible to please. Ironically, I have never yet issued a
refund to a buyer who has offered a reason for being dissatisfied. Is
this normal? It suggests to me that the problem lies not with the
product, but with the morals of the buyer.
With the purchase of a digital product you can, if
you choose, keep the product and get your money back. Online theft just
doesn't get any easier than this.
ClickBank's merchant community has suggested
various ways to tackle this problem. The most popular idea seems to be
that ClickBank should introduce a rogue customer list, identifying
serial refunders by their prior purchasing activity. Of course, the
list would be confidential - merchants would simply need the option to
specify whether they accept purchases by buyers in this category. This
solution is not without its own problems, especially the challenge of
accurately identifying buyers from one purchase to the next. With
multiple credit cards and multiple email addresses, it is relatively
easy to bypass the banned list, simply by creating a new online
persona. But, at least this initiative offers hope of a solution to the
problem.
So far, ClickBank has not announced on any plans
to update its refund policy or introduce controls to protect its
merchants from this type of fraud. Until something changes, merchants
need to adopt a pragmatic attitude to the dilemma of sham refunds. As
frustrating as it may be to see our profits willingly handed over to
fraudsters, we should remember that the reassurance offered by the
refund system probably pays us dividends many times greater, in the
form of increased sales.
Copyright © Tim Coulter. All rights reserved.
Tim Coulter is a consultant and software developer
who helps netpreneurs to harness marketing technologies.
He is also the author of "ClickBank - The
Definitive Guide" The Ultimate ClickBank Tutorial & Reference
Manual.
http://www.clickbankrevealed.com/